Registration and Login ---------------------- Clients must register with a homeserver in order to use Matrix. After registering, the client will be given an access token which must be used in ALL requests to that homeserver as a query parameter 'access_token'. If the client has already registered, they need to be able to login to their account. The homeserver may provide many different ways of logging in, such as user/password auth, login via a social network (OAuth2), login by confirming a token sent to their email address, etc. This specification does not define how homeservers should authorise their users who want to login to their existing accounts, but instead defines the standard interface which implementations should follow so that ANY client can login to ANY homeserver. Clients login using the |login|_ API. Clients register using the |register|_ API. Registration follows the same general procedure as login, but the path requests are sent to and the details contained in them are different. In both registration and login cases, the process takes the form of one or more stages, where at each stage the client submits a set of data for a given stage type and awaits a response from the server, which will either be a final success or a request to perform an additional stage. This exchange continues until the final success. In order to determine up-front what the server's requirements are, the client can request from the server a complete description of all of its acceptable flows of the registration or login process. It can then inspect the list of returned flows looking for one for which it believes it can complete all of the required stages, and perform it. As each homeserver may have different ways of logging in, the client needs to know how they should login. All distinct login stages MUST have a corresponding ``type``. A ``type`` is a namespaced string which details the mechanism for logging in. A client may be able to login via multiple valid login flows, and should choose a single flow when logging in. A flow is a series of login stages. The home server MUST respond with all the valid login flows when requested by a simple ``GET`` request directly to the ``/login`` or ``/register`` paths:: { "flows": [ { "type": "", "stages": [ "", "" ] }, { "type": "", "stages": [ "", "" ] }, { "type": "" } ] } The client can now select which flow it wishes to use, and begin making ``POST`` requests to the ``/login`` or ``/register`` paths with JSON body content containing the name of the stage as the ``type`` key, along with whatever additional parameters are required for that login or registration type (see below). After the flow is completed, the client's fully-qualified user ID and a new access token MUST be returned:: { "user_id": "@user:matrix.org", "access_token": "abcdef0123456789" } The ``user_id`` key is particularly useful if the homeserver wishes to support localpart entry of usernames (e.g. "user" rather than "@user:matrix.org"), as the client may not be able to determine its ``user_id`` in this case. If the flow has multiple stages to it, the homeserver may wish to create a session to store context between requests. If a homeserver responds with a ``session`` key to a request, clients MUST submit it in subsequent requests until the flow is completed:: { "session": "" } This specification defines the following login types: - ``m.login.password`` - ``m.login.oauth2`` - ``m.login.email.code`` - ``m.login.email.url`` - ``m.login.email.identity`` Password-based ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :Type: ``m.login.password`` :Description: Login is supported via a username and password. To respond to this type, reply with:: { "type": "m.login.password", "user": "", "password": "" } The homeserver MUST respond with either new credentials, the next stage of the login process, or a standard error response. Captcha-based ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :Type: ``m.login.recaptcha`` :Description: Login is supported by responding to a captcha (in the case of the Synapse implementation, Google's Recaptcha library is used). To respond to this type, reply with:: { "type": "m.login.recaptcha", "challenge": "", "response": "" } .. NOTE:: In Synapse, the Recaptcha parameters can be obtained in Javascript by calling: Recaptcha.get_challenge(); Recaptcha.get_response(); The homeserver MUST respond with either new credentials, the next stage of the login process, or a standard error response. OAuth2-based ~~~~~~~~~~~~ :Type: ``m.login.oauth2`` :Description: Login is supported via OAuth2 URLs. This login consists of multiple requests. To respond to this type, reply with:: { "type": "m.login.oauth2", "user": "" } The server MUST respond with:: { "uri": } The homeserver acts as a 'confidential' client for the purposes of OAuth2. If the uri is a ``sevice selection URI``, it MUST point to a webpage which prompts the user to choose which service to authorize with. On selection of a service, this MUST link through to an ``Authorization Request URI``. If there is only 1 service which the homeserver accepts when logging in, this indirection can be skipped and the "uri" key can be the ``Authorization Request URI``. The client then visits the ``Authorization Request URI``, which then shows the OAuth2 Allow/Deny prompt. Hitting 'Allow' returns the ``redirect URI`` with the auth code. Homeservers can choose any path for the ``redirect URI``. The client should visit the ``redirect URI``, which will then finish the OAuth2 login process, granting the homeserver an access token for the chosen service. When the homeserver gets this access token, it verifies that the cilent has authorised with the 3rd party, and can now complete the login. The OAuth2 ``redirect URI`` (with auth code) MUST respond with either new credentials, the next stage of the login process, or a standard error response. For example, if a homeserver accepts OAuth2 from Google, it would return the Authorization Request URI for Google:: { "uri": "https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?response_type=code& client_id=CLIENT_ID&redirect_uri=REDIRECT_URI&scope=photos" } The client then visits this URI and authorizes the homeserver. The client then visits the REDIRECT_URI with the auth code= query parameter which returns:: { "user_id": "@user:matrix.org", "access_token": "0123456789abcdef" } Email-based (code) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :Type: ``m.login.email.code`` :Description: Login is supported by typing in a code which is sent in an email. This login consists of multiple requests. To respond to this type, reply with:: { "type": "m.login.email.code", "user": "", "email": "" } After validating the email address, the homeserver MUST send an email containing an authentication code and return:: { "type": "m.login.email.code", "session": "" } The second request in this login stage involves sending this authentication code:: { "type": "m.login.email.code", "session": "", "code": "" } The homeserver MUST respond to this with either new credentials, the next stage of the login process, or a standard error response. Email-based (url) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :Type: ``m.login.email.url`` :Description: Login is supported by clicking on a URL in an email. This login consists of multiple requests. To respond to this type, reply with:: { "type": "m.login.email.url", "user": "", "email": "" } After validating the email address, the homeserver MUST send an email containing an authentication URL and return:: { "type": "m.login.email.url", "session": "" } The email contains a URL which must be clicked. After it has been clicked, the client should perform another request:: { "type": "m.login.email.url", "session": "" } The homeserver MUST respond to this with either new credentials, the next stage of the login process, or a standard error response. A common client implementation will be to periodically poll until the link is clicked. If the link has not been visited yet, a standard error response with an errcode of ``M_LOGIN_EMAIL_URL_NOT_YET`` should be returned. Email-based (identity server) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :Type: ``m.login.email.identity`` :Description: Login is supported by authorising an email address with an identity server. Prior to submitting this, the client should authenticate with an identity server. After authenticating, the session information should be submitted to the homeserver. To respond to this type, reply with:: { "type": "m.login.email.identity", "threepidCreds": [ { "sid": "", "clientSecret": "", "idServer": "" } ] } N-Factor Authentication ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Multiple login stages can be combined to create N-factor authentication during login. This can be achieved by responding with the ``next`` login type on completion of a previous login stage:: { "next": "" } If a homeserver implements N-factor authentication, it MUST respond with all ``stages`` when initially queried for their login requirements:: { "type": "<1st login type>", "stages": [ <1st login type>, <2nd login type>, ... , ] } This can be represented conceptually as:: _______________________ | Login Stage 1 | | type: "" | | ___________________ | | |_Request_1_________| | <-- Returns "session" key which is used throughout. | ___________________ | | |_Request_2_________| | <-- Returns a "next" value of "login type2" |_______________________| | | _________V_____________ | Login Stage 2 | | type: "" | | ___________________ | | |_Request_1_________| | | ___________________ | | |_Request_2_________| | | ___________________ | | |_Request_3_________| | <-- Returns a "next" value of "login type3" |_______________________| | | _________V_____________ | Login Stage 3 | | type: "" | | ___________________ | | |_Request_1_________| | <-- Returns user credentials |_______________________| Fallback ~~~~~~~~ Clients cannot be expected to be able to know how to process every single login type. If a client determines it does not know how to handle a given login type, it should request a login fallback page:: GET matrix/client/api/v1/login/fallback This MUST return an HTML page which can perform the entire login process.